JOSEPH LEONARD, APPELLANT,
v.
JIM ROWE PEST CONTROL AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the employer and carrier did not present sufficient evidence to deauthorize Dr. Finkelstein as the claimant's treating physician.
The claimant sought treatment from Dr. Finkelstein for a compensable injury, and the employer/carrier initially paid the bills. After several weeks, t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Claim For Payment Of Medical Bills cases and more on FLexlaw
ZEHMER, Judge.
Claimant, Joseph Leonard, appeals a workers’ compensation order denying his claim for authorization of Dr. Finkelstein and denying payment of medical bills of Dr. Finkelstein that claimant incurred after the employer and carrier objected to Dr. Finkelstein’s treatment. We reverse.
The record shows that before claimant filed a notice of injury form with the employer and carrier, he sought Dr. Finkel-stein’s treatment for his compensable injury. Upon receiving notice of claimant’s injury, the carrier began paying Dr. Finkel-stein’s bills and told claimant that he could see Dr. Finkelstein “with the understanding that if there was a problem down the road we would send him somewhere else.” Claimant continued to receive treatment from Dr. Finkelstein and employer/carrier paid for that treatment. After several weeks, however, employer/carrier decided to discontinue payment of Dr. Fink-elstein’s bills and sent claimant to another doctor. Claimant objected to the change in physicians and filed a claim requesting the deputy commissioner to authorize Dr. Fink-elstein and order payment of Dr. Finkel-stein’s unpaid medical bills.
The record does not contain competent, substantial evidence that would support a finding that the carrier did not authorize Dr. Finkelstein to treat claimant. On the contrary, the evidence that the carrier paid Dr. Finkelstein’s bills over a period of time without objecting to Dr. Finkelstein’s treatment of claimant permits only a finding that the employer and carrier had authorized Dr. Finkelstein. Additionally, there is no competent, substantial evidence to support the decision to deauthorize Dr. Finkelstein with respect to necessary treatment in the future. Thus, we reverse and remand with directions that the deputy commissioner reinstate Dr. Finkelstein as an authorized physician and order the employer and carrier to pay Dr. Finkelstein’s unpaid medical bills.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Redwing Owner Operators & Associated Indus. of Fla. Prop. & Cas. Tr., Inc. v. Isidro Cardenas, 648 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…ize Dr. Feldman, ... bills for treatment rendered in February, 1992 should be paid.” This conclusion accords with decisions under Section 440.13, Florida Statutes, at the time the services in question were provided. Leonard v. Jim Rowe Pest Control, 545 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). In controverting liability for the 1992 services, appellants dispute the factual determination that the bills paid in 1989 covered psychotherapeutic treatment, and assert, in effect, that Dr. Feldman deauthorized himself by no…