ARMANDO G. RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-05-16
No. 88-1029
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
543 So. 2d 384 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Trinh Trung Do v. Amoco Oil Co., 510 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); National Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 495 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Caputo v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 493 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Terjesen v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 491 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Rosa v. Jefferson’s Stores, Inc., 421 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Varig Brazilian Airlines v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 354 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); §§ 443.036(25), 443.101(1), Fla.Stat. (1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw