GEORGE KEEN, JR., AND BEN BATTLE, JR., APPELLANTS,
v.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-04-11
No. 88-603
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
541 So. 2d 164 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)


Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge.

FERGUSON, Judge.

The trial court’s findings in favor of the landlord on its claim for back rent are supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd 457 U.S. 31,102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Hetman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 349 So. 2d 1187 (Fla.1977). There is no basis, however, for the award of attorney’s fees other than a lease between the appellants and a prior owner of the property, which expired before the cause of action arose. Because the claim arises from a tenancy at sufferance, without an express agreement for attorney’s fees, the prevailing landlord is not entitled to a fee award. Generally, attorney’s fees cannot be awarded to a prevailing party unless authorized by contract or statute. Heyman v. Vonelli, 413 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw