MARY G. FELKER, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD W. FELKER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-04-04
No. 88-1953
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
540 So. 2d 927 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the former wife from a final order denying her motion for attorney’s fees in a marriage dissolution action. Because (1) both parties are employed and have relatively equal financial circumstances after the former husband’s child support and mortgage obligations under the final judgment are deducted, and (2) the marital assets of the parties were otherwise equally divided, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that both parties should pay his or her own attorney’s fees and in entering the order under review. See, e.g., Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 472 So. 2d 1180 (Fla.1985); Poppe v. Poppe, 412 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Bullard v. Bullard, 380 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Bucci v. Bucci, 350 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 559 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
    …d on the existing law, he had no choice. A trial court is not free to offer a plea bargain which is below the sentencing guidelines, over the State’s objections, unless it provides clear and convincing reasons for the departure. See State v. Lewis, 540 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989). Although principles of estoppel may be applied in carrying out the terms of a plea bargain, here estoppel has no application. The state offered no plea to the defendant and was not a party to the plea bargain offered by the cour…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw