STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DARRELL MORRIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida's appellate court affirmed dismissal of a pimping charge because the information failed to allege that the defendant derived support specifically from prostitution earnings, rather than merely from the prostitute herself.
An information charging violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.05(1) must allege that the accused derived support from the prostitution earnings, not merely that he received support from a person engaged in prostitution.
[1] A charge under Fla. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In order to charge a crime under the statute it must be alleged the accused lived from or derived support from the prostitution earnings.”
Court's statement of the legal requirement for charging under section 796.05(1)
The state charged Morris with living or deriving support from another person's prostitution earnings, but the information alleged only that he receive…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prostitution cases and more on FLexlaw
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing a criminal information which purports to allege a violation of section 796.05(1), Florida Statutes (1987). The statute provides:
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person knowing another person is engaged in prostitution to live or derive support or maintenance in whole or in part from the earnings or proceeds of such person’s prostitution.
The state charged that appellant
... live or derive support or maintenance, in whole or in part, from the earnings or proceeds of another person, to wit: Michelle Brooks, knowing the said Michelle Brooks was engaged in prostitution.
The information is deficient and fails to state a violation of the statute because it fails to allege that appellant derived support from the prostitution earnings. It merely says he got support from her, knowing she was a prostitute. At the hearing below appellant’s attorney convinced the judge to dismiss the case with the argument that merely knowing she was a prostitute and receiving support do not necessarily combine to make a violation of the statute. We agree.
In order to charge a crime under the statute it must be alleged the accused lived from or derived support from the prostitution earnings.
AFFIRMED.
COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.