ARMANDO AMADOR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARMANDO AMADOR, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
539 So. 2d 1180
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1964); State v. Maya, 529 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Duda, 437 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Mathes v. State, 375 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); United States v. Garcia, 741 F. 2d 363 (11th Cir.1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1971)
- Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1978)
- Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1978)
- Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1964)
- State v. Maya, 529 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir. 1984)
- Hans Peter Mathes and Robert Gerard Mass v. State, 375 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- State v. Duda, 437 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)