COMMERCIAL VENTURES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
TROPERO INVESTMENTS, N.V., D/B/A THE EVERGLADES HOTEL, AND SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, APPELLEES; TROPERO INVESTMENTS, N.V., D/B/A THE EVERGLADES HOTEL, APPELLANT, V. COMMERCIAL VENTURES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Failure To State A Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Everglades Hotel appeals the trial court’s order granting Commercial Ventures a temporary injunction. Commercial Ventures appeals orders denying its motion to alter the terms of the injunction and granting Southern Bell's motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand with directions to dissolve the temporary injunction, Commercial Ventures having failed to establish that it is without an adequate remedy at law. Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (lack of adequate remedy at law is prerequisite for equitable relief). We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Southern Bell without prejudice. Commercial Ventures has failed to state a cause of action against Southern Bell as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b). By the terms of its order, moreover, the trial court specifically reserved jurisdiction to join Southern Bell in the underlying litigation at some future date, if necessary.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.O. v. State, 557 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…at the 163rd Street shopping center on January 14th was the same vehicle as the white, four door car which Mr. August observed C.O. driving at 7742 N.W. 5th Court on January 15th. See C.B. v. State, 519 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); J.G. v. State, 539 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Reversed.…
-
J.E.P. v. State, 561 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…to establish that the van J.E.P. was attempting to jump-start was the same van charged in the information, see S.P.L. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), and identified by the victim as having been stolen and damaged. See J. G. v. State, 539 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Coyle v. State, 493 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (defendant was entitled to judgment of acquittal where record revealed insufficient evidence that car in defendant’s possession was same as car stolen from another); Car…
-
A.P. v. State, 226 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…at the white 1985 Toyota Camry stolen from Ms. Dixon at the 163rd Street shopping center on January 14th was the same vehicle as the white, four door car which Mr. August observed C.O. driving at 7742 N.W. 5th Court on January 15th”); J.G. v. State, 539 So. 2d 39, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“We reverse J.G.’s adjudications of delinquency and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter judgments of acquittal based upon the state’s failure to establish ownership of the automobile which J.G. was ch…
Authorities Cited
- Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)