RAMDIAL
v.
HUMANA INC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Plaintiff filed a case that was reviewed by a magistrate judge. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b) and Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Thus, the Court need not consider whether dismissal is also warranted based on
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Order requiring him to pay the partial filing fee. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk shall close the case file.
3. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to pay the partial filing fee (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot. DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2020.