TAYLOR
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court recommended transferring the habeas petition to the Middle District of Florida because the Southern District of Florida lacked jurisdiction as it was not the district of the petitioner's confinement.
Petitioner, an immigration detainee, filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petitioner was confined at Glades D…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse District Of Confinement cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [ECF No. 1]. This cause has been referred to the Undersigned for consideration and report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and S.D. Fla. Admin. Order 2019-2. [ECF No. 2]. Petitioner, Terrance Taylor, is an immigration detainee who, at the time of filing his petition, was held at Glades Detention Facility in Moore Haven, Florida. [ECF No. 1]. According to a search of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Online Detainee Locator, Petitioner remains at Glades Detention Facility as of the date of this Report. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, “District courts are limited to granting habeas relief ‘within their respective jurisdictions.’” Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2441(a)). Thus, “for core habeas petitions challenging present physical confinement, jurisdiction lies in only one district: the district of confinement.” Id. at 443. Moore Haven is located in Glades County, Florida, which is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Accordingly, the Middle District of Florida is Petitioner’s district of confinement. Thus, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Petitioner’s case. Even so, a district court has the discretion to transfer a case, rather than dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction, if such a transfer is “in the interest of justice.”
Partee v. Att’y. Gen., Ga., 451 F. App’x 856, 858 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1631). Because Petitioner is a pro se immigration detainee who remains in confinement, it is in the interests of justice to transfer, rather than dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, it is RECOMMENDED that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and the case be CLOSED by the Clerk of Court.
Objections to this Report may be filed with the District Judge within fourteen days of receipt of a copy of the Report. Failure to do so will bar a de novo determination by the District Judge of anything in the Report and Recommendation and will bar an attack, on appeal, of the factual findings of the Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). SIGNED this 4th day of September, 2020. f . ED STATES 3 JUDGE cc: Terrance Taylor A#207103211 Glades County Detention Center Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 39 Moore Haven, FL 33471