MARRON
v.
MADURO MOROS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the minor children may proceed anonymously, but the wife may not.
Plaintiffs moved for leave to proceed anonymously. The motion was filed by Carlos Eduardo Marron, Jane Doe, and their minor children C.R. and S.A.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Exceptional Case cases and more on FLexlaw
' ANONYMOUSLY BY PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE, C.R. and S.A. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Motion for Leave to proceed anonymously by Plaintiffs Jane Doe, C.R., and S.A. (D.E. 4)..
THE COURT has considered the motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ADJUDGED that the motion is GRANTED in part as the the Plaintiff's children, who may proceed anonymously. It is ADJUDGED that the motion is DENIED as to the Plaintiff?’ s wife, Jane Doe. “A plaintiff
should be permitted to proceed anonymously only in those exceptional cases involving matters ofa...real danger of physical harm[.]” Doe v. Frank, 951 F. 2d 320, 324 (11th Cir. 1992). As the
Plaintiff, Carlos Eduardo Marron, is:identified by name in the complaint, it seems of no purpose for his wife to proceed anonymously. oa DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this__/ 7 of January 2022.
GIL EP
[...] -FEDERJ@@“A. MORENO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE _ Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record