WALKER
v.
UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the motion for relief from judgment, finding that while it misidentified the rule invoked, the movant failed to meet the demanding standard required for relief under Rule 60(d)(1).
Movant Byron Walker sought relief from a judgment entered over twenty years prior, arguing the court erred in denying his motion. He contended the cou…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Extraordinary Remedy cases and more on FLexlaw
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 9, 2022.
BETH BLOOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of record Byron Walker, pro se 46692-004 Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 2000 Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Steadroy Williams v. McNEIL, 557 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2009)
- Vick Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp., 722 F.2d 677 (11th Cir. 1984)
- United States v. Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1998)
- Aldana v. DEL Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1349 (11th Cir. 2014)