THE DEERWOOD CLUB INCORPORATED, APPELLANT,
v.
I.M. SULZBACHER AND HAZEL J. SULZBACHER, HIS WIFE, DONALD W. RHODES AND NANCY C. RHODES, HIS WIFE, EDWARD W. P. SMITH AND MARY ELLEN SMITH, HIS WIFE, HENRY A. CREWS AND JUDY CREWS, HIS WIFE, BESSIE S. PRYOR, AND THE DEERWOOD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-01-06
No. BQ-276
BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
535 So. 2d 720 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the facts and law, we agree that the equities are with the appellees and find no error in the result reached by the trial court.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • LaRIVIERE v. S. Broward Hosp. Dist., 889 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …action when there is a claim for damages against a state agency or subdivision. See Levine v. Dade County Sch. Bd., 442 So. 2d 210 (Fla.1983); Broward County Sch. Bd. v. Joseph, 756 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Lecuyer v. Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 535 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Here, although the failure to notify the department is usually curable, the failure to notify the department before the three-year statute of limitations period expired could not now be cured. In Menendez v. North Broward Hospi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw