CENTRE WAY COMPANY LIMITED.

v.

INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A

recommended it be denied. The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s factual findings and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); S.D. Fla. Mag.

J. R. 4(b). Here, neither side filed any such objections. With no objections filed, the Court’s review of the Report and Recommendation (DE ) is properly limited to a de novo review of only its legal conclusions. See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. PharmaTech, LLC, 2019 WL 4673739, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2019) (“Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection.”). This Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the Report and Recommendation (DE ) have been filed, thus, the Court reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

72.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge’s Paperless Report and Recommendation to District Judge (DE ) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendant Presentime’s Notice of Motion, Motion for Attorney’s Fees, and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (DE ) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 1st day of June 2023. \

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF