DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND CRAWFORD AND COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

BETTY PIGATT WILSON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kinne v. Kinne, 599 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
  …rom his retirement benefits in determining the amount of the reduction in alimony.2 Taking into account retirement income to determine the amount of alimony is permissible. See Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1986); Rentz v. Rentz, 535 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Doing so in determining in a proper case the amount of a modification of alimony that has been provided for in a marital settlement agreement is also permissible. See Brown v. Brown, 472 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). See also Pe…
• Marie-Anne Nicole Grivet Johnson v. Johnson, 602 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
  …r type of retirement benefit, is considered a marital asset, that asset may be treated as property subject to equitable distribution or as a source of support obligations. McReynolds v. McReynolds, 546 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Rentz v. Rentz, 535 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). In the final judgment the court found, as mentioned above, that: “The Court has considered the Wife’s claim for equitable distribution of the Husband’s Military Retirement Plan and the Survivor’s Benefit Plan and in determining…
• McREYNOLDS v. McREYNOLDS, 546 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …ccordingly, erred in finding that the husband’s pension was not a marital asset. Once a pension is considered as a marital asset, it may be treated as property subject to equitable distribution or as a source of support obligations. Rentz v. Rentz, 535 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Assuming that the trial court had not made the specific finding that the pension was not a marital asset, the remaining portions of the judgment would have indicated that the court considered the pension as a marital asset and th…

Authorities Cited

• Brevard Cnty. Mental Health Ctr. & St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Kelly, 420 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)