WILLIAM R. COLON, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF SUNRISE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE CANVASSING BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEES
WILLIAM R. COLON, APPELLANT,
CITY OF SUNRISE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE CANVASSING BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLEES
534 So. 2d 830
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying temporary injunctive relief to William R. Colon. We do this because it does not appear that Mr. Colon adequately supported his assertion of irreparable injury. Minimatic Components, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 494 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We find no abuse of discretion or legal error. AFFIRM.
ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Jayson Whiteside, 56 So. 3d 799 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…he seriousness of the crime, flies in the face of the rationale for the guidelines. In effect this reason reflects a trial judge’s disagreement with the Sentencing Guidelines Commission and is not a sufficient reason for departure.”); Ivry v. State, 534 So. 2d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (“[T]he trial court’s dissatisfaction with the sentencing guidelines is not a valid departure reason.”). Because the trial court failed to provide sufficient legal grounds for Whiteside’s departure sentence, we reverse and r…
Authorities Cited
- Minimatic Components, Inc. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 494 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)