THOMPSON
v.
REGIONS SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's motion for supplemental attorney's fees without prejudice.
Plaintiff filed a motion for supplemental attorney's fees. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending denial without prejudi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch on March 4, 2025 (the “Report”) [DE 91]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 91] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 91] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 91] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusion that Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees should be denied without prejudice to be refiled, if appropriate, after the appeal is resolved for the reasons articulated in the Report.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [DE 91] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Supplemental Award of Attorney’s Fees [DE 87] is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff refiling the motion, if appropriate, after the appeal is resolved. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, on this 20th day of March, 2025.
fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af CA xe KN VIGVAML-]
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge
Copies to: Counsel of record Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)