YOUNAS MOHAMMAD, APPELLANT,
v.
J.I. KISLAK MORTGAGE CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ABDUL RASHID, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Default judgment was improper where the defendant filed a responsive pleading before the default hearing, and must be set aside without requiring a showing of excusable neglect.
A default judgment is improper and must be set aside when the defendant has filed a responsive pleading prior to the hearing on the motion for default.
[1] An erroneously entered default judgment must be set aside without requiring the defendant to demonstrate excusable neglect or a meritorious defense.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The entry of a default judgment is improper when the party against whom the default is entered has filed a responsive pleading prior to the hearing on the motion for default.”
Opening statement of the court's legal rule governing default judgments.
Mohammad filed an answer to Kislak Mortgage Corp.'s counterclaim three days before the entry of a default judgment against him.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Procedural Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The entry of a default judgment is improper when the party against whom the default is entered has filed a responsive pleading prior to the hearing on the motion for default. See Haitian Community Flamingo Auto Parts Corp. v. Landmark First Nat’l Bank of Ft. Lauderdale, 501 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising v. Cedar, 423 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b), (c); see also Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (answer filed before order of default filed with the clerk pre-eludes entry of order of default).
Compare Miami Steel Traders, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 401 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (entry of default proper when defendant failed to file answer prior to the hearing on the motion for default without meritorious defense or excusable neglect).
An erroneously entered default should be set aside without any showing of excusable neglect or meritorious defense. See Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc.; cf. Turner v. Allen, 389 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (entry of default by clerk); Mo-Con Properties, Inc. v. American Mechanical, Inc., 289 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974) (same).
In this case, appellant filed his answer to appellee’s counterclaim three days before the entry of the default judgment. The entry of the default was error. REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Chester v. Marchese, 383 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Turner v. Allen, 389 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Morgan v. State, 289 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Mo-Con Props., Inc. v. Am. Mech., Inc., 289 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- C.D. v. State, 501 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- State v. Murray, 401 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Miami Steel Traders, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 401 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)