NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
ONE LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The National Labor Relations Board sought enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum against One Lifestyle Management, LLC in federal district court. The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granted the NLRB's motion for voluntary dismissal, and closed the case.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in full, granted the NLRB's motion for voluntary dismissal, and dismissed the amended application for subpoena enforcement without prejudice.
“Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the R. & R.”
Establishes the consequence of failing to object to magistrate judge recommendations within the statutory period
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe NLRB filed an Amended Application for Order Requiring Obedience to Subpoena Duces Tecum against One Lifestyle Management, LLC. A Magistrate Judge …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Voluntary Dismissal cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Marty Elfenbein, (“R. & R.,” D.E. 18), issued on May 13, 2025. The R. & R. provides the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file objections. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the R. & R.. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent review of the R. & R. and record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. The R. & R. (D.E. 18) is ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Petitioner's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (D.E. 17) is GRANTED;
3. The Amended Application for Order Requiring Obedience to Subpoena Duces Tecum (D.E. 4) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and 5. This case is now CLOSED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 2nd day of June, 2025.
goan A. Lenard JOAN A. LENARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)