ADDERLEY
v.
PREFERRED PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATES LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court adopted a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and granted in part a plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees, awarding $4,400 in fees while otherwise denying the motion.
The Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and granted Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees in part, awarding $4,400 in attorney's fees while otherwise denying the motion.
[1] A magistrate judge's factual findings are adopted and incorporated into a district court's opinion when no timely objections are filed.
[2] A district court may conduct a de novo review of a magistrate judge's report even in the absence of objections.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report [DE 31] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion.”
Establishes the standard for adopting a Magistrate Judge's Report when no objections are timely filed.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Adderley filed a Verified Motion for Attorney Fees against Preferred Primary Care Associates LLC. A Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Rec…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Patrick Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 31], issued on August 25, 2025, and Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Attorney Fees [DE 18], filed on November 18, 2025. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 31] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 31] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).
Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 31] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 31] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Verified Motion for Attorney Fees [DE 18] is hereby GRANTED IN PART as follows: a. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,400; b. Plaintiff's Motion is otherwise DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 4th day of September, 2025. fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af Lf Xe AW AVWGIAAA-T MfEe<
VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge
Copies to: Counsel of Record Magistrate Judge Patrick Hunt
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)
- LoConte v. Dugger, 488 U.S. 958 (U.S. 1988)