FIDELITY WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.
v.
SIX M'S II, LLC D/B/A CHRYSLER OF LAWRENCEBURG
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs, granting the motion and awarding costs in the amount of $5,208.24 to Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.
Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs is granted, and Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs in the amount of $5,208.24.
“As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report [DE 61] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion.”
Establishes the standard for adopting magistrate judge findings when no objections are timely filed.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFidelity Warranty Services, Inc. filed a Motion for Bill of Costs against Six M's II, LLC d/b/a Chrysler of Lawrenceburg. The Magistrate Judge issued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bill Of Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 59]; and the September 2, 2025 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt [DE 61] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 61] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report [DE 61] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F. 2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F. 2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).
Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 61] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [DE 61] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 59] is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff is entitled to the costs in the amount of $5,208.24.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 17th day of September, 2025.
WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LoCONTE v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745 (11th Cir. 1988)
- Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144 (11th Cir. 1993)