AROCHO
v.
SECRETARY, DOC (LEE COUNTY)

M.D. Fla. | 2019-10-09
No. 2:16-cv-910-FiM
District Court, M.D. Florida (2019) Negative Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith and denied his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.


Facts & Procedural History

The petitioner filed a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis after the court denied his motion for a certificate of appealability. The court fo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

: Before the Court is Petitioner Julian Arocho’s Motion for Leave to Appeal /n Forma Pauperis (Doc. 24) filed on August 16, 2019. On July 17, 2019, the Court entered an Order denying Plaintiffs Motion for a Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 23). Pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith and he will be required to pay the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees. See also Mcintosh v. United State Parole Comm., 115 F. 3d 809, 812 (10th Cir. 1997) (Petitioner must demonstrate “the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal.”). Petitioner has not identified any meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Because the Court has certified

1 Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users’ convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

that this appeal is not taken in good faith, any request to proceed in forma pauperis should be sent directly to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Petitioner's Julian Arocho’s Motion for Leave to Appeal /n Forma Pauperis (Doc. 24) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 8th day of October 2019.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SA: FTMP-2 Copies: All Parties of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw