STOEHNER SERVICE SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1988-11-09
Nos. 87-1768, 87-2949
LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur., ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.
533 So. 2d 897 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these actions and reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against appellant on its claims for fraud and intentional interference with a contract. We believe factual issues exist as to appellee Bell South’s responsibility for its manager’s and other employees’ interference in a contract between appellant and Southern Bell. Similarly, we believe a fact issue exists as to Southern Bell’s responsibility for fraud in entering into the contract with the appellant knowing that the agent delegated to supervise the contract intended to prevent the appellant from successfully performing the contract.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.

Dissent
ANSTEAD, Judge,

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting in part.

I agree that a fact issue exists in the intentional interference action, but I would affirm the trial court’s judgment on the fraud action.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stutzke v. Kohl, 576 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
    …er Citrus Sales, Inc. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all counts. This court reversed, determining there to be issues of material fact that precluded summary judgment. See Stutzke v. D.G.C. Liquidation Company, 533 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So. 2d 989 (Fla.1989). On remand, the case was heard by a jury and the trial court then directed a verdict on the tortious interference claim in favor of DGP, Kohl, Walker, Graves Brothers Company and Indian Ri…
  • Gilman Yacht Sales, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank OF Chicago, 600 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …an’s name and that Kaufman was able to buy the Southerly at a lower price by cutting out Gilman and eliminating the five percent commission otherwise due and payable. These disputed facts create triable issues. See Stutzke v. D.G.C. Liquidation Co., 533 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); American Medical Int’l v. Scheller, 462 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Craig W. Sharp P.A. v. Adalia Bayfront Condominium Ltd., 547 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Since the summary judgment in favor of Kaufman on the civil theft…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw