FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
v.
MOBE LTD.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding fees for the Receiver and law firm.
The Receiver applied for fees for services rendered, and the law firm Akerman LLP applied for fees and expenses. The Magistrate Judge recommended gran…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Receiver Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 247) in full. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 247) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. The Receiver’s Verified Third Application for Payment for Services Rendered (Doc. 241) is GRANTED and the Receiver is authorized payment of $99,957.00 in fees. 3. The Receiver’s Verified Third Application for Payment for Services Rendered and Reimbursement for Costs Incurred by Akerman LLP (Doc.
243) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: a. The Receiver is authorized to pay Akerman LLP $21,330.00 in fees and $490.00 in expenses; b. In all other respects, the Akerman Application is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 8, 2020.
ae ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Copies to: Counsel of Record Pro se party