GIBBS
v.
MLK EXPRESS SERVICES, LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2020-02-14
No. 2:18-cv-434
District Court, M.D. Florida (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in full, denying the parties' joint notice to approve a proposed notice to the class.

Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiffs filed a notice of nonobjection to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and defendants did not object. The parties submitted a jo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review Legal Conclusions De Novo Review Of Legal Conclusions Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

MLK EXPRESS SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., MANIHONG M. PHANOUVONG, LILA V. PHANOUVONG, AMAZON.COM, INC. and AG PLUS EXPRESS, LLC,

Defendants. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 177). Plaintiffs filed a notice of nonobjection to the R&R. (Doc. 178). Defendants did not object, and the time to do so passed. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not review factual findings de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). But the district court reviews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. legal conclusions de novo, even without an objection. Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). After a careful, complete, and independent examination of the file, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy’s R&R in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 177) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The parties’ Joint Notice of Filing Proposed Notice to the Local Delivery Driver Class (Doc. 175), construed as a motion to approve the proposed notice, is DENIED without prejudice. 3. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and submit an amended proposed notice and consent form—consistent with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 177)—on or before March 13, 2020 for the Court's further consideration and approval. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 14th day of February, 2020.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw