HART
v.
AUBURNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prisoner with three or more prior dismissals for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim cannot proceed in forma pauperis unless under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Plaintiff, a prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint without paying the filing fee. He has multiple prior cases dismissed for reasons that qualify un…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Imminent Danger Exception cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint (Doc. 1), and apparent supplements or amendments thereto (Docs. 3, 4),1 as well as a document titled “Access to Courts” (Doc. 5). Having reviewed the documents and being otherwise fully advised the Court Orders as follows: Plaintiff initiated this action on August 3, 2020, and, as of the date of this order, has not paid the filing fee. The Court, accordingly, treats this action as an in forma pauperis proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915 by adding the following subsection: (g) In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Thus, if a prisoner has had three or more cases dismissed for one of the recited reasons, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the filing fee in full at the time the lawsuit is initiated. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F. 3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). Consequently, courts have a responsibility to dismiss cases, even sua sponte, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See, e.g., Casey v. Scott, 493 F. App’x 1000, 1001 (11th Cir. 2012). Plaintiff’s prior cases, dismissed as either frivolous, malicious, or for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted include: Hart v. Judd,
8:11-cv-1590-T-33TBM, Hart v. State of Florida, 8:13-cv-2533-T-30MAP, Hart v. Knight, 8:16-cv-1337-T-33JSS, and Hart v. Hays, 16-cv-1391-T-17TGW. In an apparent attempt to satisfy the “imminent danger” exception, Plaintiff
states in his “Access to Courts” filing that he “has suffered bodily injury on June 10, 2020.” (Doc. 5 at 3). However, he provides no further details about the injury or surrounding circumstances. This is insufficient to satisfy the exception. See e.g., Ball v. Allen, No. 06-0496-CG-M, 2007 WL 484547 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 8, 2007) (explaining
that “[t]he plaintiff must allege and provide specific fact allegations of ongoing serious physical injury, or a pattern of misconduct evidencing the likelihood of imminent serious physical injury, and vague allegations of harm and unspecific references to injury are insufficient.” (Citations and quotation marks omitted)). Therefore, because he has had three prior dismissals that qualify under Section 1915(g) and because he has not sufficiently alleged that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. This preclusion against proceeding in forma pauperis is without regard to the merits of the present civil rights complaint. Plaintiff may initiate a new civil rights case by filing a civil rights complaint and paying the filing fee in full. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new complaint, in a new case, with a new case number, upon the payment of the filing fee. The CLERK is directed to TERMINATE any pending motions and to CLOSE this case. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on August 20, 2020.
wm eA,