JONES
v.
SCOTTY'S AUTOMOTIVES, INC.

M.D. Fla. | 2020-09-16
No. 2:20-cv-557
District Court, M.D. Florida (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court dismissed the case with prejudice following a settlement between the parties.

Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued defendants for unpaid overtime wages under the FLSA. The parties reached a settlement for the FLSA claims and filed a joint stipulation…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Unpaid Overtime Wages Under Flsa Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(a)(ii) Unpaid Overtime Wages Fair Labor Standards Act

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unpaid Overtime Wages Under Flsa cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

SCOTTY’S AUTOMOTIVES, INC. and SCOTT P. JANSON,

Defendants. /

ORDER1

Before the Court is the parties’ Notice of Settlement (Doc. 13) and Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 14). Plaintiff sued Defendants for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). (Doc. 1). The parties settled the FLSA claims in full without compromise and with attorney’s fees negotiated separately. So the Court need not review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F. 2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); Bonetti v. Embarq Mgmt. Co., 715 F. Supp. 2d 1222, 1226 n.6 (M.D. Fla. 2009). Each party signed the Joint Stipulation, so the Court will dismiss this case with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F. 3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. (1) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all pending deadlines or motions, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 16th day of September, 2020.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw