LEAGUE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while the Commissioner showed good cause for an extension, a ninety-day stay would cause undue delay, and thus granted a sixty-day extension.
The Commissioner of Social Security requested a ninety-day stay of proceedings to allow the agency to produce a certified transcript of the administra…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discretion To Stay Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court are Defendant’s Opposed Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Doc. 11) and Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 12). In this Social Security case, Defendant requests the Court stay the proceedings for ninety days or until such time as the Agency regains capacity to produce a certified transcript of the administrative record necessary to draft an answer and adjudicate the case. (Doc. 11, p. 1). Due to the current situation in this country, Defendant represents the Agency has transitioned to a telework environment, but encountered difficulties that impact the operations of the Social Security Administration’s Office of Appellate Operations. (Id., pp. 1-3). Plaintiff opposes the ninety-day stay and suggests Defendant can accelerate the processing of the present case by making it a priority over other cases that do not oppose motions for additional time to certify the transcript and answer. (Doc. 12, p. 2). A court has broad discretion whether to stay a proceeding “as an incident to its power to control its own docket.” Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706-707 (1997). The court must weigh the benefits of the stay against any harms of delay. Jd. at 707. Here, the Commissioner has provided good cause to extend the deadline to file the certified transcript and answer. But the Court finds a ninety-day extension would cause undue delay. The Court will extend the deadline to file the certified transcript and answer by sixty days. Accordingly, the Opposed Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Doc. 11) 1s GRANTED in part. The Court extends the deadline for Defendant to file a certified transcript and answer to January 22, 2021. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December 4, 2020.
Lida E La ell.