HAMANN
v.
LITTLE ITALY'S MEATBALLS, LLC

M.D. Fla. | 2021-04-20
No. 8:20-cv-2589
District Court, M.D. Florida (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding specific amounts for wages, liquidated damages, tips, attorney's fees, and costs, while denying prejudgment interest.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Alexis Hamann moved for default judgment against defendants Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC, and Carl R. Meyers, Jr. The Magistrate Judge reco…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 25), filed on March 31, 2021. Judge Porcelli recommends that Plaintiff Alexis Hamann’s Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 19) be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the report recommends denying Hamann her request for pre-judgment interest (Doc. # 25 at 17), but awarding the following amounts: (1) unpaid wages in the amount of $181.25; (2) liquidated damages in the amount of $181.25; (3) unpaid tips in the amount of $877.00; (4) attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,480.00; (5) and costs in the amount of $490.00. (Id. at 18). Judge Porcelli also recommends awarding post-judgment interest. (Id.). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has lapsed. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation and grants in part the Amended Motion for Default Judgment. Discussion After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept,

reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F. 3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 25) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff Alexis Hamann’s Amended Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 19) is GRANTED in part. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of

Hamann and against Defendants Little Italy’s Meatballs, LLC and Carl R. Meyers, Jr. in the following amounts: (1) unpaid wages in the amount of $181.25; (2) liquidated damages in the amount of $181.25; (3) unpaid tips in the amount of $877.00; (4) attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,480.00; and (5) costs in the amount of $490.00. (4) Hamann is also awarded post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Interest shall accrue from the date of this judgment at the federal statutory rate. (5) Hamann’s request for prejudgment interest is DENIED. (6) Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE

THE CASE.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 20th day of April, 2021.

hin YG. Hen, Cres VIR IA M. HERNANDEZ'*COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw