UNITED STATES
v.
ROCK SOLID CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a defendant's motion to vacate a clerk's entry of default should be granted when the failure to respond was not willful and setting aside the default would not prejudice the plaintiff.
The United States sued Rock Solid Construction Services, LLC, which failed to timely respond to the complaint. The clerk entered a default against Roc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Rock Solid Construction Services, LLC (Rock Solid) moves to vacate clerk’s entry of default. (Doc. 9). This request is unopposed. (Doc. 11). On March 19, 2021, the United States sued Rock Solid and the clerk issued the summons on March 22, 2021. (Docs. 1, 3). On March 26, 2021, a process server served Rock Solid with the complaint and summons. (Doc. 5). Rock Solid failed to timely respond to the complaint. The United States successfully moved for clerk’s default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). (Docs. 7, 8). After learning of the default, Rock Solid’s counsel appeared in this action. (Doc. 10). A court may set aside entry of a clerk’s default for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). “Good cause” under Rule 55(c) is a liberal standard. Sherrard v. Macy’s Sys. and Tech., Inc., 724 F. App’x 736, 738 (11th Cir. 2018) (quotation and citation omitted); see also Jones v. Harell, 858 F. 2d 667, 668-69 (11th Cir. 1988) (affirming the district court’s holding that “a bare minimum showing” will justify relief under Rule 55(c)). If a party willfully defaults by displaying either an intentional or reckless disregard for the judicial proceedings, a court
may decline to set aside a clerk’s default. Burgos v. Valleycrest Golf Course Maintenance, No. 2:10-cv-194-FtM-29SPC, 2010 WL 2243805, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 4, 2010). Rock Solid’s failure to timely respond to the complaint is neither willful
nor constitutes a reckless disregard for the judicial process. Setting aside the default would not prejudice the United States. Good cause exists to set aside the clerk’s default against Rock Solid. Accordingly, Rock Solid’s motion to vacate clerk’s entry of default (Doc. GRANTED. Rock Solid must respond to the United States’ complaint by May 24, 2021. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on May 17, 2021. Aranda. Ayre Ah Sane
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Howard W. Jones in Bankruptcy for James Steven Boyd v. Harrell, 858 F.2d 667 (11th Cir. 1988)