SWEET
v.
UNIFIRST CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the parties' arbitration agreement was valid and enforceable, thus compelling arbitration and staying the proceedings.
Plaintiff Elaine Sweet consented to Defendant Unifirst Corporation's motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Unifirst filed a motion to com…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Compel Arbitration cases and more on FLexlaw
2. Unifirst’s original motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot. 3. Sweet’s claims against Unifirst are referred to arbitration. 4, Sweet and Unifirst are DIRECTED to file a joint report on the status of arbitration proceedings by July 31, 2021, and every thirty days afterward.
5. This case is STAYED pending arbitration.
6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close this case and terminate any pending motions and deadlines. DONE in Tampa, Florida, on June 1, 2021.
Fath Kewnlall Miryelle Kathryr Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. 2005)
- Jpay, Inc. v. Kobel, 904 F.3d 923 (11th Cir. 2018)