SHROPSHIRE
v.
TOWING & AUTO REPAIR MANAGEMENT CORP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting default judgment for the plaintiff on FLSA claims.
Plaintiff filed suit against defendants for FLSA overtime and minimum wage violations. The magistrate judge recommended granting plaintiff's motion fo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Christopher P. Tuite, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on April 23, 2021. (Doc. 21). Judge Tuite recommends that 1) Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on Damages Against All Defendants (Doc. 19) be granted; 2) that default judgment be entered in Plaintiff’s favor and against the Defendants on Plaintiff’s FLSA overtime and minimum wage claims (Counts I and II) in the total amount of $5,403.75; 3) that the Court retain jurisdiction over this action to address any request by Plaintiff for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and Local Rule 7.01; and 4) that the Court direct the Clerk of Court to close the case following the entry of the default judgment and a determination of Plaintiff’s entitlement to a sum certain for attorney’s fees and costs. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no
objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Tuite’s report and recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in all respects. The Court agrees with
Judge Tuite’s detailed and well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Tuite’s report and recommendation (Doc. 21) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on
Damages Against All Defendants (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of JUSTIN SHROPSHIRE and against TOWING & AUTO REPAIR MANAGEMENT CORP., d/b/a Victory Towing, JOSEPH D. SIMPSON, and JESSICA K. SIMPSON on Plaintiff’s FLSA overtime and minimum wage claims (Counts I and II) in the total amount of $5,403.75. (4) The Court retains jurisdiction over this action to address any request by Plaintiff for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and Local Rule 7.01. (5) The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case following the entry of the default judgment and a determination of Plaintiff's entitlement to a sum certain for attorney’s fees and costs. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 9th day of July, 2021.
eo A fr | | UY / ed | / I ¢ a A —~ [mu Og
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)