CHITTENDEN
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to award taxable costs to the defendant.
The magistrate judge recommended awarding the defendant $2,955.80 in taxable costs against the plaintiff. Neither party objected to the report and rec…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Taxable Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Amanda A. Sansone, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on August 12, 2021. (Doc. 58). Judge Sansone recommends that “Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Determine Defendant’s Entitlement to Costs” (Doc. 54) be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Judge Sansone recommends that Defendant be awarded $2,955.80 in taxable costs against Plaintiff. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed an objection to the report and recommendation, and the time to object has expired.1 After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district
Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Sansone’s report and recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in all respects. The Court agrees with Judge Sansone’s detailed and well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions. Consequently, “Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Determine Defendant’s Entitlement to Costs” is granted in part and denied in part.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Sansone’s report and recommendation (Doc. 58) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) “Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Determine Defendant’s Entitlement to Costs” (Doc. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
(3) The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant Hillsborough County is awarded $2,955.80 in taxable costs against the Plaintiff James Chittenden. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (4) The motion is DENIED to the extent that Defendant seeks additional or different relief. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 13th day of September, 2021.
= / 4) ee / ‘| | io 1. | / I ¢ 2 A [...] je! |
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)