THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET.AL
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET.AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to compel arbitration and stay the case pending arbitration proceedings.
Plaintiffs sued defendants. Defendants moved to compel arbitration and stay the claims. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Compel Arbitration cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 18; Report) entered by the Honorable James R. Klindt, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 10, 2021. In the Report, Judge Klindt recommends that Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Claims Pending Arbitration (Dkt. No. 8) be granted; that the parties be directed to submit Plaintiffs’ claims to arbitration; that this case remain stayed; and that the parties be directed to file joint status reports. See Report at 22. To date, no objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district
court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM- 29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the
Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 18) is ADOPTED as the
opinion of the Court. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Claims Pending Arbitration (Dkt. No. 8) is GRANTED. 3. The parties are directed to submit Plaintiffs’ claims to arbitration in
accordance with the Dispute Resolution section contained in the Subcontract Agreement.
4, This case remains STAYED pending the completion of the arbitration proceedings. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate any pending motions and keep the case administratively closed until further Order. 6. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report upon the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. If the arbitration is not completed by February 4, 2022, then the parties shall file a joint status report at that time and every 120 days thereafter until the arbitration proceedings are completed. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 4th day of October, 2021.
MARCIA MORALES HOWARD
United States District Judge
ja Copies to: Counsel of Record