LATIMER
v.
U-HAUL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and the plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Plaintiff filed a complaint against U-Haul alleging a conspiracy and moved to proceed in forma pauperis. The Magistrate Judge recommended denying the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Private Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
2. Latimer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.
3. Latimer’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim. 4, The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in U-Haul’s favor, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this case. ENTERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 5, 2021.
— hati Mizelle United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Simpson v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., 744 F.3d 702 (11th Cir. 2014)
- White v. Sch. Bd. of Hillsborough Cnty., 636 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (M.D. Fla. 2007)