LAS BRISAS
v.
EMPIRE INDEMNITY INSURANCE

M.D. Fla. | 2021-11-22
District Court, M.D. Florida (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The court held that punitive damages are a form of damages, not a separate claim for relief, and denied the motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim as improperly pleaded.

Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued for unfair claims practices and punitive damages. Defendant moved to dismiss the punitive damages count, arguing it was conclusory and …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Claim For Relief Remedies Punitive Damages

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Claim For Relief cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

Defendant. /

OPINION AND ORDER1

Before the Court is Defendant Empire Indemnity Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 62), and Plaintiff Las Brisas Condominium Association, Inc.’s response (Doc. 63).2 This is an insurance bad faith dispute. The initial Complaint (Doc. 4) included one count for unfair claims practices under Fla. Stat. §§ 624.155 and 626.9541. The Amended Complaint includes a separate count for punitive

To start, punitive damages are a form of damages, not a claim for relief. See Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc., 184 F. 3d 1292, 1297-98 (11th Cir. 1999), vacated in part on other grounds, 204 F. 3d 1069 (11th Cir. 2000) (“It is clear, however, that a request for punitive damages is not a ‘claim’ within the meaning of 8(a)(2); it is only part of the relief prayed for in the claim.” “Punitive damages are a remedy.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c) (“These rules apply to a civil action after it is removed from a state court.”). Thus, the Amended Complaint is improper in this regard. The Court will allow Las Brisas to file a second amended complaint to properly plead punitive damages as a form of damages under the unfair claims count. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. Defendant may file a second amended complaint by December 2, 2021. If Defendant does not file a second amended complaint, the case will proceed on Count I of the amended complaint (Doc. 60). 2. Defendant Empire Indemnity Insurance Company’s Motion to

Dismiss Count II of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 62) is denied. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on November 22, 2021.

ites POLSTER atta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. 2 Neither filing follows Local Rule 1.08’s typography requirements. For efficiency reasons, the Court will not strike the papers. But the parties should not expect future leniency from the Court for this failure to follow the Local Rules. damages. (Doc. 60). Empire moves to dismiss the punitive damages for failure to state a claim because the allegations are conclusory.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw