WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
v.
SIMS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court held that the defendant's repeated removals of the state foreclosure case were procedurally defective and warranted remand.
The defendant removed a state foreclosure case to federal court for a second time, despite a prior remand order and pending appeal. The new notices of…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Removal cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before the Court sua sponte. Pro se defendant Sha’ron A. Sims removed the underlying state case, No. 16-2015-CA-003618, from the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, on November 8, 2021. Doc. 1. She then filed an Amended Notice of Removal three days later. Doc. 3. This is the second time she has removed this 2015 foreclosure case. Wells Fargo Bank v. Sims, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB (M.D. Fla.). The Court previously remanded the case based on numerous procedural defects. See Order Remanding Case, Doc. 16, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB. Sims has appealed the Court’s remand of that case in that proceeding, and the appeal is still pending. Docs. 18, 19, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB. The present Notices of Removal contain nonsensical and irrelevant arguments including whether the Court invoked equity and whether the Court’s original judgment was void. Docs. 1 at 1–2; 3 at 3–4. None of the arguments alter any of the reasons for remand in the previous case.
The Court has warned Sims that “any future misbegotten effort to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction will likely lead to an award of fees.” Doc. 16 at 6–7, 3:21- cv-166-TJC-PDB. Because attorneys for Wells Fargo have not yet filed notices of appearance, the Court will not impose fees at this time. However, Sims is again informed that “[a]n order remanding [a] case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred as a result of the removal.” Gonzalez v. J.C. Penney Corp., 209 F. App'x 867, 869 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). If Sims chooses to remove this case to federal court yet again, the Court will hear a motion from Wells Fargo for attorney’s fees and costs, and will likely grant it. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. The case is REMANDED to the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida.
2. Defendant Sims’ Motion to Pay Docketing Fees in Installments is
DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida the 24th day of November, 2021.
o> Cimothe . Corrigan Ww. TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN United States District Judge agb Copies: Pro se plaintiff Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida