ROUSSIN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2022-01-03
No. 2:20-cv-905
District Court, M.D. Florida (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court accepted and adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, reversing and remanding the Commissioner's decision.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff appealed the Commissioner of Social Security Administration's decision. The magistrate judge recommended reversing and remanding the decisio…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

SECURITY and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Defendants. /

OPINION AND ORDER1

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 21). Judge McCoy recommends reversing and remanding the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Neither party objects to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the magistrate judge’s R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence

Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App’x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999). After examining the file independently and upon considering Judge

McCoy’s findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. The decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is REVERSED AND

REMANDED.

1. The Commissioner is instructed on remand to do the following: Re-evaluate whether work exists in significant numbers that Plaintiff can perform in light of her RFC, specifically identifying and resolving any apparent conflicts between the testimony of the VE and the DOT. 2. Any application for fees, costs, or expenses must comply with the Court’s Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, In

re Administrative Orders of the Chief Judge, Case No. 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. 48 (Dec. 7, 2021). 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, deny any pending motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 3, 2022.

, Lh platrathe 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Footnotes
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the R&R de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw