YATES

v.

ENVISION GLASS & ALUMINUM

ENVISION GLASS & ALUMINUM, RICHARD FRASER, and BLAKE FRASER,

Defendants. /

OPINION AND ORDER1

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 38). Judge McCoy recommends granting the Joint Renewed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37) and approving the revised Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37-1). No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the magistrate judge’s R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence

Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App’x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999). After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the

Court finds no plain error. It thus accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The Joint Renewed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37) is GRANTED and the revised Settlement

Agreement (Doc. 37-1) is APPROVED.

3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions or deadlines, and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on February 8, 2022.

,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record