MIDDLETON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The plaintiff moved for attorney's fees and costs under the EAJA after her case was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security. The Commissioner …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Offset For Federal Debt cases and more on FLexlaw
Barbara Middleton moves for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. Section 2412. (Doc. 30). The Commissioner does not oppose the motion. (Id. at 6). Ms. Middleton requests $3,733.00 in attorney’s fees. The EAJA permits awards for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing party against the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2412. A February 15, 2022 order remanded the case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 28). The Clerk entered judgment in
1 Kilolo Kijakazi is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). favor of Ms. Arnum. (Doc. 29). The Commissioner does not contest the following: Ms. Middleton is the prevailing party; Ms. Middleton’s net worth was less than $2 million when she filed her complaint; the Commissioner’s position was not substantially justified; and the Commissioner has no objection to the requested award of attorney’s fees. (Doc. 30, pp. 1–2). A court should grant a Social Security claimant’s request for attorney’s fees when it is unopposed. See Jones v. Colvin, No. 8:13-cv-2900-VMC-AEP, 2015 WL 7721334 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2015) (awarding unopposed attorney’s fees request). No special circumstances make an attorney’s fees award in this matter unjust. Thus, Ms. Middleton is entitled to $3,733.00 in attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees awarded to a claimant under the EAJA can be offset to satisfy the claimant’s pre-existing debt to the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). Following this order, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Ms. Middleton owes a debt to the United States. Ms. Middleton assigned her rights to EAJA fees to her attorney. (Doc. 30, Ex. 2). If Ms. Middleton has no federal debt, the United States will accept her assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to counsel.
Accordingly, Ms. Middleton’s motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. Ms. Middleton is awarded $3,733.00 in attorney’s fees. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on April 26, 2022. Aranda Are he Savane.
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge