PASS-A-GRILLE BEACH COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC.
v.
CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH, FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation regarding attorney fees and costs.
Plaintiff sought attorney fees and costs. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion in part, awarding a reduced amount of fees and specifie…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clear Error Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Sean P. Flynn, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on April 11, 2022. (Doc. 64). Judge Flynn recommends that “Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion on the Amount of Attorney Fees and Expenses to Which it is Entitled” (Doc. 54) be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Judge Flynn recommends that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $254,018.68 (a 15% reduction) and costs in the amount of $4,347.70. No objection to the report and recommendation has been filed, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Flynn’s report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Flynn’s detailed and well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions. Consequently, Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs (Doc. 54)
is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Flynn’s report and recommendation (Doc. 64) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) “Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion on the Amount of Attorney Fees and
Expenses to Which it is Entitled” (Doc. 54) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (3) Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $254,018.68 and costs in the amount of $4,347.70. (4) The Clerk is directed to enter an amended final judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant that includes the award of attorney’s fees and costs in this case, as set forth herein. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of April, 2022.
Lh} fF [Abe —“ fw! (Gy
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)