FRESENIUS VASCULAR CARE, INC.
v.
VASUDEVA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court accepted and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting the motion to determine entitlement to attorneys' fees.
Plaintiff National Medical Care, Inc. filed a motion to determine entitlement to attorneys' fees. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse De Novo Review Of Factual Findings (In Absence Of Objections) cases and more on FLexlaw
and NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v. Case No. 8:21-cv-1474-VMC-JSS
INDI VASUDEVA and TAMPA RENAL PHYSICIANS, P.L.,
Defendants. ______________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 26), filed on April 28, 2022, recommending that Plaintiff National Medical Care, Inc.’s Motion to Determine Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. # 24) be granted. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has lapsed. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation and grants the Motion. Discussion After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff’d, 28 F. 3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994). After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 26) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff National Medical Care, Inc.’s Motion to Determine Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. # 24) is GRANTED. National Medical Care is directed to submit a supplemental motion in accordance with Middle District of Florida Local Rule 7.01(c). DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 16th day of May, 2021.
VIR TA M. HERNANDEZ'COVINGTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 1993 WL 259424 (S.D. Fla. 1993)