RUSSELL
v.
WARREN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prisoner with three or more prior dismissals for frivolousness, malice, or failure to state a claim cannot proceed in forma pauperis unless under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Plaintiff, a prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint without paying the filing fee. Plaintiff had three prior cases dismissed under the criteria of 2…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Imminent Danger Of Serious Physical Injury Exception cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff Russell’s civil rights Complaint (Doc. 1). Having reviewed the Complaint and being otherwise fully advised the Court Orders as follows: The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915 by adding the following subsection: (g) In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Thus, if a prisoner has had three or more cases dismissed for one of the recited reasons, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the filing fee in full at the time the lawsuit is initiated. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F. 3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). Consequently, courts have a responsibility to dismiss cases, even sua sponte, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See, e.g., Casey v. Scott, 493 F. App’x
1000, 1001 (11th Cir. 2012). Plaintiff’s prior cases, dismissed as either frivolous, malicious, or for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted include Russell v. Wester, et al., 8:20-cv-00531-VMC-JSS (M.D. Fla); Russell v. Ojeda, 8:20-cv-01000-MSS-
CPT (M.D. Fla); and Russell v. Cockrell, 8:21-cv-02889-MSS-AEP (M.D. Fla). Because Plaintiff has had three prior dismissals that qualify under Section 1915(g), he does not allege in the complaint that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and he has not paid the filing fee, Plaintiff’s complaint is due to be dismissed. Plaintiff may initiate a new civil rights case by filing a new civil rights complaint and paying the filing fee in full. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new complaint, in a new case, with a new case number, upon the payment of the filing fee.
2. The CLERK is directed to CLOSE this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on July 21, 2022.