DIANA RICHARDS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEE
DIANA RICHARDS, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEE
530 So. 2d 504
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant complains of the trial court’s preservation of testimony in a termination of parental rights proceeding. A review of the record in its entirety clearly demonstrates that the trial court was correct in the ultimate order it entered based on the evidence before it, excluding the testimony which was perpetuated, and therefore we find no error in the order under review. At best, under the entire circumstances, the error would be harmless. Pulitzer v. Pulitzer, 449 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Greenfield v. Bland, 99 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1987). Therefore, the order of termination under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morhaim v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. & Jorge Antonio Gomez, 559 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…accepted or rejected the uninsured motorists coverage. The jury returned a verdict in favor of State Farm and a final judgment was entered. Appellants appealed that judgment, which this court affirmed. Morhaim v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, 530 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Appellants filed a timely motion for relief from judgment pursuant to rule 1.540(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The substance of appellants’ motion was that new evidence had been discovered, post-trial. According to the…
Authorities Cited
- In re McCLANAHAN, 99 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
- Pulitzer v. Pulitzer, 449 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)