IVAN RUIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-09-06
No. 87-2115
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BASKIN, J., and JOSEPH P. McNULTY, Associate Judge.
530 So. 2d 503 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The convictions under review are affirmed upon the holdings that the evidence was entirely sufficient to support the finding of guilt and that the alleged restriction on cross-examination constituted no more than harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt. Mobley v. State, 409 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1982); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1987).

The upward departure sentence is affirmed on the authority of Sans v. State, 528 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), which approved a guidelines deviation imposed upon a co-defendant for the same reasons as those asserted here. As the state concedes, however, it was improper to impose consecutive three year minimum mandatory provisions pursuant to section 775.- 087(2), Florida Statutes (1987). Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983). Hence, upon remand, the two three-year mandatory sentences shall be made concurrent.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw