ERIC SEGARRA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1988-09-02
No. 87-1912
HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
530 So. 2d 492 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish a violation. We find his arguments unpersuasive. The written order of revocation fails, however, to indicate the grounds of Segarra’s probation violation although at the sentencing hearing the trial court made such a statement. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of the defendant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a proper written order corresponding with its oral pronouncement. Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Antoine Jelks v. State, 770 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …reme court's decisions in Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000), and Thomas v. State, 763 So. 2d 316 (Fla.2000), affect only precedent involving defective orders. See, e.g., Campbell v. State, 526 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Segarra v. State, 530 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Coley v. State, 479 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We note that unusual sentencing documents may still raise jurisdictional concerns. See Monroe v. State, 760 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). See also Grantham v. State, 735 So. 2d…
  • Felton W. Williams v. State, 532 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
    …v. Pentaude, 500 So. 2d 526 (Fla.1987). Absent from the record, however, is a written order conforming to the oral pronouncement revoking the appellant’s community control. This matter is remanded for the entry of a proper order. Segarra v. State, 530 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.…
  • Cannon v. State, 574 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …ant’s community control, but which did not specify the conditions violated. We affirm the revocation, which was entered pursuant to a guilty plea, but remand for entry of an order which specifies which conditions were violated. See Segarra v. State, 530 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Affirmed and remanded. SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw