UNITED STATES
v.
COLLINS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the defendant's motion to set aside the clerk's default because good cause existed.
The clerk entered a default against the defendant for failing to update his address and comply with court orders. The defendant moved to set aside the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 55(C) cases and more on FLexlaw
Further, the plaintiff requests that the Court require the defendant to respond to the plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and requests for admissions by the original deadline of March 2, 2023, and serve his Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures with these responses. (Doc. 19 at ¶ 9). However, to the extent Defendant has had problems receiving mail, it seems unrealistic to require his compliance within a few days of this Order. Instead, it appears appropriate to provide Defendant an additional week. Accordingly, Defendant shall have until March 9, 2023, to respond to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and requests for admissions and to serve his Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures. Finally, Defendant is cautioned that despite proceeding pro se, he is required to comply with this Court’s Orders and Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence. Defendant may obtain a copy of the Local Rules from the Court’s website (http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov) or by visiting the Office of the Clerk of Court. Also, resources and information related to proceeding in court without a lawyer, including a handbook entitled Guide for Proceeding Without a Lawyer, can be located on the Court’s website (http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/pro_se/default.htm). Defendant should also consult the Middle District of Florida’s Discovery Handbook for a general discussion of this District’s discovery practices (see http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/civil-discovery-handbook). DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on March 1, 2023.
PHILIP R. LAMMENS
United States Magistrate Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Compania Interamericana Export-Import, S.A. v. Compania Dominicana de Aviacion, 88 F.3d 948 (11th Cir. 1996)