SAUNDERS
v.
SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the defendant's unopposed motion for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
The defendant filed an unopposed motion requesting the court to enter an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) to prevent waiver of privilege by…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Work Product Protection cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF RULE 502(d) ORDER (Doc. No. 13) FILED: March 14, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendant asks the Court to enter an Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Doc. No. 13. Plaintiff does not oppose. Id. at 3. Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) states that “[a] federal court may order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court—in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding.” Fed. R. Evid. 502(d). As the Rule makes clear, the decision on whether to enter an order pursuant to Rule 502(d) is discretionary.
Id. However, “[f]ederal courts, including those in Florida, routinely enter such orders upon request of the parties.” Diaz v. Chapters Health Sys., Inc., No. 8:18-cv- 3052-T-36-SPF, 2019 WL 1498873, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2019) (collecting cases). Upon review of the proposed order submitted by Defendant, see Doc. No. 13,
at 6–7, the Court finds the request well taken. Accordingly, Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Rule 502(d) Order is GRANTED (Doc. No. 13), and it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information (“ESI”) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding.
This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 2. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s
right to conduct a review of documents, ESI, or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 14, 2023.
ayn [...]
LESLIE AN PRICE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties