THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
ROBERT F. THOMPSON, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1988-08-25
No. 69594
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
529 So. 2d 1120 Florida Supreme Court (1988)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court approved the referee's report, suspending respondent from the practice of law for one year and placing him on probation for two years.


Facts & Procedural History

Respondent Robert F. Thompson was found by a referee to have neglected his clients' business on five separate occasions, violating Disciplinary Rule 6…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1121] PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the referee’s report. Neither party seeks review.

The referee found that respondent Robert F. Thompson had neglected his clients’ business on five separate occasions and accordingly recommended that he be found guilty of five counts of violating Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

On the matter of discipline the referee recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and be placed on probation for two years under certain terms and conditions. The period of probation is to commence upon the filing of this judgment.

We approve the referee’s report. We hereby suspend Robert F. Thompson from the practice of law for one year and place him on probation under the terms and conditions set forth in the referee’s report. As is provided by rule 3-5.1(h) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, respondent must provide notice of this suspension to all clients with matters pending in his practice. The suspension ordered herein shall take effect September 26, 1988, so that respondent can take steps to safeguard the interests of his clients. In the meantime, respondent shall accept no new clients.

The costs of this proceeding are assessed against respondent. Judgment is entered against Robert F. Thompson for costs in the amount of $2473.27, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw