KRIEN
v.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the unopposed motion to transfer the case.
Plaintiffs filed suit in the Middle District of Florida. They filed an unopposed motion to transfer the case to the Western District of North Carolina…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Convenience Of Witnesses cases and more on FLexlaw
now consent to this transfer. Second, after weighing the various factors, including convenience of the witnesses, the location of relevant documents, and the locus of operative facts, the Court finds the interests of justice will best be served by transfer. See Thursday LLC y. Klhip Inc., 8:17-cv-1587-CEH-AEP, 2018 WL 4574877, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 11, 2018) (citing Manuel v. Convergys Corp., 430 F. 3d 1135 n.1 (11th Cir. 2005), which lists the factors to be considered, and noting that “there is no single dispositive factor’). Accordingly, the motion (Dkt. 20) is granted. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina. The Clerk shall immediately forward this case to the Western District of North Carolina and complete the transfer and thereafter close the case. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on November 29, 2023. me,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of record