DOZR, LTD.
v.
BIGHORN CONSTRUCTION AND RECLAMATION, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for default judgment on Count I and denying it as moot on Count II.
Plaintiff moved for default judgment. The magistrate judge recommended granting the motion. No objections were filed by the Defendant.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clear Error Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Anthony E. Porcelli, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on December 5, 2023. (Doc. 26). Judge Porcelli recommends that “Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Default Judgment” (Doc. 22) be granted. No party has objected, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th
Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Porcelli’s report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Consequently, the Plaintiff’s renewed motion for default judgment is granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
(1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 26) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
(2) “Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Default Judgment” (Doc. 22) is hereby GRANTED as to Count I and DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Count II.
(3) The Clerk is directed to enter default judgment as to Count I in favor of Plaintiff Dozr, Ltd., and against Defendant Bighorn Construction and Reclamation, LLC, in the amount of $462,083.13, which includes $81,541,49 in prejudgment interest.
(A) Following the entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 20th day of December, 2023.
YL, hee —~ joe! _
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)